Talk:Magic Effect

Tapering

Can someone explain this more? A graph or an example of how these work would be much appreciated --- Fowl 22:40, 10 February 2012 (EST)

I've messed around with these a bit and from what I can tell:
Taper Duration-just a straight addition to the duration of the spell the effect is attached to
Weight-I think is just a straight multiplier for the magnitude specified in the spell the effect is attached to
Curve-not sure what the equation/graph would actually look like, but the higher the number, the more sharply the damage tapers off
edit: I tried a negative number in the curve field (like a -2) and ended up with a dead actor with -10000 ish hp.
Cscottydont 04:17, 19 February 2012 (EST)

I figured out the formula. Graphs possibly to come. --Evil4Zerggin 20:17, 7 April 2012 (EDT)

Flags

The page says "No Recast: Not used. ". This is untrue as the magic effects attached to the master level destruction spells have this checkbox checked. Anyone have any idea what this does, or if it just does nothing?
Cscottydont 07:58, 19 February 2012 (EST)

It's possible that "Not used" simply means "not used by the game engine", i.e. the flag does nothing anymore. It may have worked at some point in development, which could explain why it's ticked on some spells.

Do you notice any differences in a spell depending on whether or not this flag is checked?

-- Cipscis 08:13, 19 February 2012 (EST)

That makes sense. It has no apparent effect on the player/spells cast by the player. Unsure of the effects on other Actors.

--Cscottydont 09:14, 4 March 2012 (EST)

I found a bug in CK in the "Magic Effect" dialog. When I enable "No Magnitude" flag and select "Assoc. Item 1" - "NONE", save my ESP file, and open it again in CK, "Assoc. Item 1" becomes "Health". And in the game, on the Skills Window, my Magic Effect increases Health by one point for my char.

Solution - uncheck the "No Magnitude" flag, "Assoc. Item 1" won't become "Health".

P.S. Sorry for my english.

Effect Archetypes

Accum. Magnitude

Tried using the Accum. Magnitude Archetype on a Concentration type Magic Effect. My guess is its broken. The spell immediately set the targets health to 1 (or some other low number, I wasn't fast enough to console check it before they died) then immediately after that, killed the target.
Cscottydont 04:14, 19 February 2012 (EST)

This effect archetype is used by wards, it's certainly linked to the way they take time to charge up (hence the name accumulated magnitude). It probably needs WardPower as an associated effect to work.--Tang Un 12:57, 7 March 2012 (EST)

Peak Value Modifier

I've noticed that enchantments stack but potions don't, despite both of them using Peak Value Modifier. Is it that the second AV has to be set for stacking not to occur? --Evil4Zerggin 23:14, 10 February 2012 (EST)

Peak Value Modifier seems to work the same as Value Modifier if Associated Item 2 is set to NONE. However the current description of Peak Value Modifier is completely wrong. Associated Item 2 does not take an Actor Value; it takes a Keyword. —Vinifera7 23:56, 23 February 2012 (EST)

I've never seen this, is there an example magic effect like this I can look at? --- Fowl 05:25, 27 February 2012 (EST)

I believe Vinifera7 is correct. Take a look at any of the Alchxxxx effects that use Peak Value Modifier. Evil4Zerggin's observation was correct. Associated Item 2 needs to be set to a keyword that multiple effects share for those effects not to stack.

--Cscottydont 09:31, 4 March 2012 (EST)

Think I've figured it out. If two PVMs have the same keyword set, they are exclusive of each other, and only the bigger value will be active, while the lesser will get canceled. See OakArmor and StoneArmor for examples. Kdansky 13:14, 29 February 2012 (EST)

Correction, I just found an example which worked differently: If you have a +250 FortifyHealth (ValueMod) effect, and a -100 RavageHealth (ValueMod), you'll end up with +150 (as expected). If you recast that spell, you end up with two of each (+300, as expected). But if you change the Fortify effect into PeakVM and put its own keyword in, you'll end up with (surprise) +150, no matter how often you cast it. And weirdly enough, only one Fortify Effect is in your active effects list, but all the Ravage effects are there, though only one applies its modifiers. Weird? Kdansky 13:30, 29 February 2012 (EST)

Demoralize and Turn Undead

I can't find any difference in their function. They both modify confidence and aside from the conditions on the magic effects they seem to be technically the same. --- Fowl 18:18, 22 February 2012 (EST)

They are the same as far as I can see too. Just the conditions.

Open

I can't get this to work. It's as if doors and containers aren't affected by magic. Can anyone confirm this? ~ Dwarfmp 03:47, 29 February 2012 (EST)

-Confirmed: Tested this with both an 'Apply Combat hit spell' and regular spell. Seems that natively, doors and containers do not recognize a magic impact. Might have to alter or extend their scripts through a new one to change this? ~Blackcompany

Or surround your door/container with a trigger box, then attach your OnHit script event to that trigger's reference. --HawkFest (talk) 08:58, 3 December 2012 (EST)

Known Bugs and Crashes

-Equipping Aimed, Fire and Forget spells near a Skeleton actor will crash the game if the Base Effect of the spell lacks casting/projectile information. Confirmed with 4 repeatable CTD's, without warnings or errors. Fixed by adding projectile information to Base Effect. Unable to reproduce crash by equipping spell near NPC or Animal actors, or even using it on them. Only happened with Skeletons and was corrected by re-adding projectile information to spell.

Script

I've found a very specific bug. Self targeting area of effect magic effects of script or stagger archetypes (have not tested with other archetypes) that are used in a lesser power do not have a working AoE unless paired with another AoE magic effect of value modifier archetype (have not tested with other archetypes).

Doing any of these will make it work:

1. Change the magic effect so it has no area (no longer an AoE magic effect).
2. Change the magic effect to the value modifier archetype.
3. Change the magic effect to target actor or target area delivery type.
4. Change the lesser power using it from a lesser power to a spell.
5. Add a second magic effect to the lesser power with an area of effect. (The first effect's AOE is limited to the second effect's.)

--Fg109 19:35, 1 April 2012 (EDT)

Disabling "push away"-effect on dead targets

Is it possible to disable this "push away"-effect caused by projectiles from a spell on dead targets/actors? I already tried the flags "No Hit Effect", "No Hit Event", "No Magnitude", "No Area" and "Painless", but it changed nothing. I also exclude dead actors in the conditions, but it also changed nothing. Is there no way to disable this? --Kahmul 12:23, 25 April 2012 (EDT)

Sounds

I haven't tested this for all of the sound entries, but the Release entry only plays the first .wav in the Sound Description set, rather than choosing one randomly as you would expect. —Vinifera7 (talk) 22:11, 25 August 2012 (EDT)

Base Cost and Skill Usage Mult

I've removed a note stating that Base Cost and Skill Usage Mult had no effect on custom effects because in my testing, they worked fine. What I did was to create a brand new effect and then manually select all the same settings as the Clairvoyance effect, then assign the new effect to the Clairvoyance spell instead of the old one. Modifying Base Cost and Skill Usage Mult worked as expected—increasing Base Cost made the spell cost go up and increasing Skill Usage Mult made the skill increase faster.

One might argue that copying an existing spell's values as a test means I didn't actually create a custom effect, despite it being new, but I think that actually proves the point: if using existing values in a new effect fails to reproduce the problem, then the problem lies somewhere else (i.e., not choosing the correct values to make things work right) or the problem only occurs under very specific conditions, which would need to be investigated and documented. – Robin Hood  (talk) 2013-11-05T00:54:04 (EST)