Difference between revisions of "CreationKit:Community Portal/Organization"

imported>Dragoonwraith
imported>Catwheezle
(→‎Template:Unsigned: new section)
Line 232: Line 232:
:I know that the Oblivion CS Wiki's Function template is quite robust; not sure where the GECK version stands.
:I know that the Oblivion CS Wiki's Function template is quite robust; not sure where the GECK version stands.
:[[User:Dragoonwraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion; size=2;">D</span>ragoon <span style="font-family: Oblivion; size=2;">W</span>raith]] [[User_talk:Dragoonwraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion; size=2;">TALK</span>]] 23:14, 21 February 2012 (EST)
:[[User:Dragoonwraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion; size=2;">D</span>ragoon <span style="font-family: Oblivion; size=2;">W</span>raith]] [[User_talk:Dragoonwraith|<span style="font-family: Oblivion; size=2;">TALK</span>]] 23:14, 21 February 2012 (EST)
== Template:Unsigned ==
So, I made a bit of a change to template:unsigned, so it wouldn't care what order your arguments were, or even whether you'd left the date off.
This came about because of a [[:User talk:Catwheezle|conversation]] with [[User:Fowl|Fowl]], included below, where they created a second template, Unsigned2. This is how mediawiki handled the problem, and it is a good option... but I felt that two templates would be a little unfriendly and confusing, and we'd have to choose which is the better of the two, to recommend that people use, and things like that.
The new template SEEMS to work, and was a good learning experience for me towards more complex templates. Interested whether people think it's crap and shouldn't be used, though.
--[[User:Catwheezle|Catwheezle]] 03:21, 23 February 2012 (EST)
Anonymous user