Difference between revisions of "CreationKit:Community Portal/Organization"

imported>Catwheezle
(→‎Template:Unsigned: cool, but maybe too brittle?)
imported>CraftySentinel
Line 248: Line 248:


::Not a huge issue even then, maybe, because bizarrely, it seems like the ones entered in the past won't be affected because it caches those in some freaky-weird way that I didn't understand when I was testing, and made me spend ages going "hey, this isn't changing... why isn't this changing?" --[[User:Catwheezle|Catwheezle]] 01:58, 24 February 2012 (EST)
::Not a huge issue even then, maybe, because bizarrely, it seems like the ones entered in the past won't be affected because it caches those in some freaky-weird way that I didn't understand when I was testing, and made me spend ages going "hey, this isn't changing... why isn't this changing?" --[[User:Catwheezle|Catwheezle]] 01:58, 24 February 2012 (EST)
== Papyrus Functions Organisation ==
I know it's been awhile since people have posted here but hopefully we can start up the organisation conversation again. I think it would be beneficial for a page dedicated as a list for all functions that can be used within papyrus.
The Papyrus category is hardly a good way of finding functions due to... well being spread out all over the page(As all categories are). So instead this dedicated page would be similar to  [http://cs.elderscrolls.com/index.php?title=List_of_Functions CSWiki], quite simply functions categorised into tables from A-Z, or alternatively it might be more efficient to sort them by Script Object, Actor, ActorBase, ActiveMagicEffect, etc.
I don't mind doing the legwork for this page but I would like input from others before I commit to any changes/creation. So what do you guys think? I am leaning towards having it Script Object Based. --[[User:CraftySentinel|CraftySentinel]] ([[User talk:CraftySentinel|talk]]) 2013-08-24T05:35:24 (EDT)