Difference between revisions of "CreationKit:Community Portal/Organization"
CreationKit:Community Portal/Organization (edit)
Revision as of 08:13, 26 August 2013
, 08:13, 26 August 2013→Papyrus Functions Organisation: Added note on unsual papyrus function page names.
imported>Fowl |
imported>CraftySentinel m (→Papyrus Functions Organisation: Added note on unsual papyrus function page names.) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 244: | Line 244: | ||
:I'm amazed this was possible with markup, well done sir. --- [[User:Fowl|Fowl]] 18:04, 23 February 2012 (EST) | :I'm amazed this was possible with markup, well done sir. --- [[User:Fowl|Fowl]] 18:04, 23 February 2012 (EST) | ||
::Heh - thanks :) Sadly, though, it's a more brittle solution than yours, for all its snazziness. If the wiki gets an update that happens to change that error message, then the template will stop accepting arguments in the non-default order until someone updates the error message in the template to be the same. | |||
::Not a huge issue even then, maybe, because bizarrely, it seems like the ones entered in the past won't be affected because it caches those in some freaky-weird way that I didn't understand when I was testing, and made me spend ages going "hey, this isn't changing... why isn't this changing?" --[[User:Catwheezle|Catwheezle]] 01:58, 24 February 2012 (EST) | |||
== Papyrus Functions Organisation == | |||
I know it's been awhile since people have posted here but hopefully we can start up the organisation conversation again. I think it would be beneficial for a page dedicated as a list for all functions that can be used within papyrus. | |||
The Papyrus category is hardly a good way of finding functions due to... well being spread out all over the page(As all categories are). So instead this dedicated page would be similar to [http://cs.elderscrolls.com/index.php?title=List_of_Functions CSWiki], quite simply functions categorised into tables from A-Z, or alternatively it might be more efficient to sort them by Script Object, Actor, ActorBase, ActiveMagicEffect, etc. | |||
I don't mind doing the legwork for this page but I would like input from others before I commit to any changes/creation. So what do you guys think? I am leaning towards having it Script Object Based. --[[User:CraftySentinel|CraftySentinel]] ([[User talk:CraftySentinel|talk]]) 2013-08-24T05:35:24 (EDT) | |||
:Sounds like a great idea to me. --[[User:Catwheezle|Catwheezle]] ([[User talk:Catwheezle|talk]]) 2013-08-24T15:09:12 (EDT) | |||
::Created the page ([[List of Papyrus Functions]]) to begin with it's flagged as incomplete for now. All Papyrus Functions should be there that are on the wiki, also added a [[Template:Compact ToC|Compact ToC]] template. I just hope I haven't jumped the gun on this. | |||
::I noticed there's a small number of pages that do not follow the usual naming convention for Papyrus pages(Function - BaseScript) Perhaps it will pay to move them to names that are inline with the naming convention for uniformity? By my count there's only 7. --[[User:CraftySentinel|CraftySentinel]] ([[User talk:CraftySentinel|talk]]) 2013-08-25T06:16:16 (EDT) | |||