Difference between revisions of "CreationKit:Community Portal/Organization"
CreationKit:Community Portal/Organization (edit)
Revision as of 08:13, 26 August 2013
, 08:13, 26 August 2013→Papyrus Functions Organisation: Added note on unsual papyrus function page names.
imported>Catwheezle (→Template:Unsigned: cool, but maybe too brittle?) |
imported>CraftySentinel m (→Papyrus Functions Organisation: Added note on unsual papyrus function page names.) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
::Not a huge issue even then, maybe, because bizarrely, it seems like the ones entered in the past won't be affected because it caches those in some freaky-weird way that I didn't understand when I was testing, and made me spend ages going "hey, this isn't changing... why isn't this changing?" --[[User:Catwheezle|Catwheezle]] 01:58, 24 February 2012 (EST) | ::Not a huge issue even then, maybe, because bizarrely, it seems like the ones entered in the past won't be affected because it caches those in some freaky-weird way that I didn't understand when I was testing, and made me spend ages going "hey, this isn't changing... why isn't this changing?" --[[User:Catwheezle|Catwheezle]] 01:58, 24 February 2012 (EST) | ||
== Papyrus Functions Organisation == | |||
I know it's been awhile since people have posted here but hopefully we can start up the organisation conversation again. I think it would be beneficial for a page dedicated as a list for all functions that can be used within papyrus. | |||
The Papyrus category is hardly a good way of finding functions due to... well being spread out all over the page(As all categories are). So instead this dedicated page would be similar to [http://cs.elderscrolls.com/index.php?title=List_of_Functions CSWiki], quite simply functions categorised into tables from A-Z, or alternatively it might be more efficient to sort them by Script Object, Actor, ActorBase, ActiveMagicEffect, etc. | |||
I don't mind doing the legwork for this page but I would like input from others before I commit to any changes/creation. So what do you guys think? I am leaning towards having it Script Object Based. --[[User:CraftySentinel|CraftySentinel]] ([[User talk:CraftySentinel|talk]]) 2013-08-24T05:35:24 (EDT) | |||
:Sounds like a great idea to me. --[[User:Catwheezle|Catwheezle]] ([[User talk:Catwheezle|talk]]) 2013-08-24T15:09:12 (EDT) | |||
::Created the page ([[List of Papyrus Functions]]) to begin with it's flagged as incomplete for now. All Papyrus Functions should be there that are on the wiki, also added a [[Template:Compact ToC|Compact ToC]] template. I just hope I haven't jumped the gun on this. | |||
::I noticed there's a small number of pages that do not follow the usual naming convention for Papyrus pages(Function - BaseScript) Perhaps it will pay to move them to names that are inline with the naming convention for uniformity? By my count there's only 7. --[[User:CraftySentinel|CraftySentinel]] ([[User talk:CraftySentinel|talk]]) 2013-08-25T06:16:16 (EDT) | |||