Difference between revisions of "User talk:Macmanchomp"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cipscis (→Vim Syntax: Here are some things you might find useful) |
imported>Macmanchomp |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: -- [[User:Cipscis|Cipscis]] ([[User talk:Cipscis|talk]]) 00:21, 29 August 2012 (EDT) | : -- [[User:Cipscis|Cipscis]] ([[User talk:Cipscis|talk]]) 00:21, 29 August 2012 (EDT) | ||
:: @ [[User:Cipscis|Cipscis]] The reason I would like to see it is to mimic it. I like the way it looks and it would make the word selection less tedious. | |||
::: Sorry, when I read your original message I misread "creation kit wiki" as "creation kit". I don't have access what the wiki uses to generate the markup used for Papyrus source code, but perhaps this page might be of use to you - [[User:Cipscis/Syntax_Highlighting_Test]] | |||
::: -- [[User:Cipscis|Cipscis]] ([[User talk:Cipscis|talk]]) 21:02, 30 August 2012 (EDT) | |||
:::: Thank you for the pointers. The only issue I have is getting all the actual keywords organized as I don't have enough time to figure it all out and get it all separated properly. Though the highlight test page will serve as a great way for me to make sure that my vim syntax works right. Thank you again. | |||
:::: -- [[User:Macmanchomp|Macmanchomp]] ([[User talk:Macmanchomp|talk]]) 18:34, 31 August 2012 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:39, 31 August 2012
Vim Syntax[edit source]
Working on a vim syntax plugin and I would much like to see the source of what the creation kit wiki uses for their syntax. It would make my life a lot easier. PS I am versed in PHP.
- Except for interpreting certain flags, the Creation Kit itself doesn't really deal in Papyrus - the assembler and compiler are separate tools. What you might find more useful is the Papyrus language definition files for the text editors available on the wiki.
- Pages like Script File Structure will probably also be quite useful, as well as the Papyrus language reference pages.
- @ Cipscis The reason I would like to see it is to mimic it. I like the way it looks and it would make the word selection less tedious.
- Sorry, when I read your original message I misread "creation kit wiki" as "creation kit". I don't have access what the wiki uses to generate the markup used for Papyrus source code, but perhaps this page might be of use to you - User:Cipscis/Syntax_Highlighting_Test
- -- Cipscis (talk) 21:02, 30 August 2012 (EDT)
- Thank you for the pointers. The only issue I have is getting all the actual keywords organized as I don't have enough time to figure it all out and get it all separated properly. Though the highlight test page will serve as a great way for me to make sure that my vim syntax works right. Thank you again.
- -- Macmanchomp (talk) 18:34, 31 August 2012 (PST)
- -- Cipscis (talk) 21:02, 30 August 2012 (EDT)