Talk:Main Page

About the Original Author

	Joel Burgess
	Gameography Bloodrayne 2 Aeon Flux Oblivion Fallout 3 Skyrim
Joel Burgess is a senior designer at Bethesda Game Studios. Some of his contributions to Skyrim include Labyrinthian, Blackreach, Yngol Barrow, and The Midden, as well as contributing to some creature gameplay, such as dragons, wispmothers and spriggans.

---

---

How soon will the possibility of translating the wiki into several languages ​​like wikipedia?

---

Use it: Language policy

1. Translate this article into your language.
2. Under the rules, create a new Main Page with its own language (for example Russian main page, Polish main page)
3. Place this template at the bottom of the page to display a menu of languages.
4. Optionally, use Translate-link or Ulink for links.

Vitamant 15:25, 1 April 2012 (EDT)

---

---

Lonely Wiki

• This wiki seems rather lonely, or even empty, at least where I contribute. Can anyone recruit new users from UESP? We could use more contributors on this wiki. SFK363 13:07, 9 April 2012 (EDT)
  • For some reason the major of people dealing with Skyrim seem to be anti-CKWiki. There is a lot of info posted at the CK forums that doesn't get put into a page here. As it has remained like this for 2 years now, it is safe to say, this isn't going to change. All you can do is try the best you can with contributing to the wiki.--Terra Nova2 (talk) 2014-09-24T08:10:54 (EDT)

I can help with contributions. I'm finally done playing with Skyrim, and I'm interested in building new locations and quests. I'm disappointed with the very small number of mods that provide new quests. It seems like most people are only interested in fancy graphics or new armor. I am new to modding, but I can try to provide editing tips as I'm learning. --Dave 10:19, 10 September 2012 (EDT)

Is this wiki still active?

Hi,

I only wanted to ask whether this wiki is still in use, because I do not want to waste my time translating this wiki into german and its dead already. This wiki helped me a lot by developing my own mods and I wanted to give sth. back. Tough there is not much activity here...

Yes, it certainly is! There might not be not as much activity now as there was five months ago, but a lot of people continue to use the wiki's resources. That being said, I'm certain it will increase once again with the release of the Dawnguard DLC. Any contributions you can make in the meantime would be very much welcome - There are bound to be other German modders who'd benefit from your translations. Thank you for considering it.

By the way, you can sign your posts by appending '~~~~' to them.
shadeMe ^TALK 17:08, 30 May 2012 (EDT)

That´s great. I just read the chronicle and it was ... moderate. Then I will start translating it. Thank you for the quick answer.

Samuel Yaron 04:47, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

Thanks again!
shadeMe ^TALK 06:12, 31 May 2012 (EDT)

CK version number / patch notes

Fellow modders and Bethesda programmers, is there any chance to communicate CKs’ current version number and the implemented changes? It would help. thx

I would like to second this. If the Main Page stated somewhere what the current version of Creation Kit was it would be a big help. I'm still using 1.6.9 and plan on updating to 1.8??? (see, I don't know which version it is) when SKSE gets updated. I should not have to go elsewhere to find this information, the very notion seems silly when this is the Creation Kit wiki.Antares (talk) 15:00, 10 November 2012 (EST)

I'm going to go ahead and do it myself. I can edit pages here, I only thought that the Main Page was kinda off-limits, thus my hesitation.Antares (talk) 12:22, 11 November 2012 (EST)

Edit: It would seem I don't have the privileges to edit the Main Page. How disappointing. I suppose it's common sense really, can't be having just anyone taking liberties with the Main Page.

Someone please update the Main Page soon.Antares (talk) 12:26, 11 November 2012 (EST)

I've added a link to the Creation Kit article.
shadeMe ^TALK 12:44, 11 November 2012 (EST)

Thanks for that ShadeMe, the link took me quite some time to find because the text isn't hyperlink-blue. Was that intentional? Antares (talk) 04:55, 12 November 2012 (EST)

This seems to be a general effect on this wiki. Links to already visited pages are displayed in a very dark blue and are hard to spot. --Alfwyn (talk) 06:03, 12 November 2012 (EST)

The link style is determined by the wiki's style sheet. You can change it by either switching to a different one or writing your own. At any rate, I've added some emphasis to the link.
shadeMe ^TALK 13:42, 12 November 2012 (EST)

Syntax highlighting busted

This error is causing script examples to disappear. Anyone know how to fix this? Heres the error with added *

Invalid language. You need to specify a language like this: <*source lang="html4strict">...</source> Supported languages for syntax highlighting:

And heres a few places it shows up. http://www.creationkit.com/Action_Script http://www.creationkit.com/Array_Reference http://www.creationkit.com/Activator_Script

Yay for the wiki syntax fix!

Suggestions?

Where can we submit suggestions for improving the program? when I unload a small plugin, it re-loads the entire main data files which takes ages, all I wanted to do was unload and reload the small plugin I'm making

should be rather swift, but takes forever. A "Revert to saved" would be handy too.

Creation Skin bug

If anyone with server access is monitoring this page, it looks like the recent MediaWiki upgrade broke the Creation Skin and it's messing up the top-left tabs. To see what I mean, compare pages with long titles, like Differences from Previous Scripting with the Creation skin and the Vector skin. I'm not sure what the purpose of the skin is, since it seems on the surface to be Vector by any other name, but whatever changes were initially made will have to be re-incorporated into the newer version of the Vector skin.

I haven't explored thoroughly, but the main problem seems to be coming from the #left-navigation code, which was set to use absolute positioning in 1.20, and doesn't seem to have any special CSS applied in 1.22.

For the average Joe who doesn't like where the Page and Discussion tabs are: just switch to using Vector and everything should be fine. – Robin Hood  (talk) 2013-12-13T05:28:46 (EST)